Who is this who darkens counsel by words without knowledge?
People believe what they want to believe whether they have studied the particular issue or not. When it comes to origins (creation-evolution), more and more scientists and respectable scholars see the flaws of evolution and draw different conclusions.
A group of scientists studying the human genome are now claiming that Neo-Darwinism “ignores much contemporary molecular evidence and invokes a set of unsupported assumptions about the accidental nature of hereditary variation.”
The great philosopher of science, Dr. Karl R. Popper, said, “I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research program—a possible framework for testable scientific theories.”
In a sense, some evolutionists are saying, “Don’t confuse me with the facts.” Facts like the missing links that are completely missing, or the improbability against life just arising by chance, or how mutations are virtually always harmful, but according to the evolutionary scheme they proved beneficial, and so on.
Question to ponder: How can we stand up for the truth in a world of lies?